The U.S. presidential election just concluded, and together, Donald Trump and Kamala Harris raised over $4.2 billion—a staggering amount that shows how willing people are to donate. What if US can generate this much support and passion for political campaigns, what if it directed that same energy toward solving big social issues, such as homelessness in the country?
Imagine if this funding was directed to helping those who don’t have a home. With billions of dollars, we could get a lot done. It could fund emergency shelters, job training programs, mental health services, and long-term affordable housing. This could give millions of people a fresh start and the support they need to get back on their feet.
What’s inspiring about money raised on this election campaign is that a large chunk of the money raised didn’t just come from big corporations or wealthy individuals—it came from millions of small donors. Regular people who believe in a cause contributed, and their small donations added up. This tells us something powerful: many people care, and they’re willing to help when they know their support matters.
If we could set up a transparent and trusted campaign, I believe people would rally around it just as they do for political candidates. The key would be creating a structure that people can believe in, one where they know exactly where their money is going and can see the positive impact it has. For instance, people might be more likely to donate to a homelessness fund if they know it will directly help those in their own neighborhoods, towns, or cities, allowing them to see the difference they’re making close to home.
Not just United States, this model can be applied to any part of the world. I feel this model will transcend. For example, a group of people might start by donating to address a social issue like homelessness in their neighborhood. They might then become interested in green initiatives in their city and contribute and volunteer for those. They could also support mental health and drug programs in their state and even contribute to disaster relief programs in their country. This demonstrates how the model can transcend local boundaries.
In fact, it could go global. If people saw that this model works, they might join in to support causes across borders. For instance, those who want to make a difference could fund food security programs in Africa, clean water projects in Asia, or climate initiatives that affect the entire planet. There are indeed people who are already donating to relief programs in Africa and war-torn areas, showing that the willingness to help transcends geographical boundaries.
It’s inspiring to think of the possibilities. With a clear, transparent system, we could channel the same enthusiasm and generosity we see in elections toward causes that truly impact lives. Together, with the right framework, we could create a world where people unite not just for politics but for shared humanity, one issue at a time. This level of collaboration and commitment could change the world, proving that when people believe in a cause, they can make anything happen.
Comments